forum.lex.bg

veselinaz написа:Добър вечер,

Никъде не успях да намеря информация за суверенитета на българските граждани, затова пиша тук. Моля, да ме извините ако темата не е в подходящият форум.

Интересува ме същестува ли таква процедура в България? Мога ли да твърдя името си, да съм независима от държавата и регулациите в нея, както и държавата да няма права върху личната ми информация. Всеизвестен факт, е че правителствата продават личната ни информация на частни компании. Не искам да съм част от система, в която не вярвам.

Благодаря за вниманието и се надявам, че някой е запознат със суверенитета в България.

Приятна вечер.

This Court has developed a new awareness and understanding of a category of vexatious litigant. As we shall see, while there is often a lack of homogeneity, and some individuals or groups have no name or special identity, I have collectively labelled them as Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Argument litigants [“OPCA litigants”], to functionally define them collectively for what they literally are. These persons employ a collection of techniques and arguments promoted and sold by ‘gurus’ (as hereafter defined) to disrupt court operations and to attempt to frustrate the legal rights of governments, corporations, and individuals.

.....

These claims are, of course, pseudolegal nonsense. A judge who encounters and reviews OPCA concepts will find their errors are obvious and manifest, once one strips away the layers of peculiar language, irrelevant references, and deciphers the often bizarre documentation which accompanies an OPCA scheme. When reduced to their conceptual core, most OPCA concepts are contemptibly stupid. Mr. Meads, for example, has presented the Court with documents that appear to be a contract between himself, and himself. One Mr. Meads promises to pay for any liability of the other Mr. Meads. One owns all property, the other all debts. What is the difference between these entities? One spells his name with upper case letters. The other adds spurious and meaningless punctuation to his name. Mr. Meads (with punctuation) is the Mr. Meads who appeared in court. He says the Mr. Meads (all capitals) is the one who should pay child and spousal support.

So where is that Mr. Meads (all capitals)? At one point in the June 8 hearing Mr. Meads said that Mr. Meads (all capitals) was a “corporate entity” attached to his birth certificate. Later, he told me that the other Mr. Meads was a “person” - and that I had created him! Again, total nonsense.

The bluntly idiotic substance of Mr. Mead’s argument explains the unnecessarily complicated manner in which it was presented. OPCA arguments are never sold to their customers as simple ideas, but instead are byzantine schemes which more closely resemble the plot of a dark fantasy novel than anything else. Latin maxims and powerful sounding language are often used. Documents are often ornamented with many strange marking and seals. Litigants engage in peculiar, ritual‑like in court conduct. All these features appear necessary for gurus to market OPCA schemes to their often desperate, ill‑informed, mentally disturbed, or legally abusive customers. This is crucial to understand the non-substance of any OPCA concept or strategy.

doondie написа:Нямах представа, че идеята за социален регрес, какъвто очевидно е случаят, е повдигната сериозно тук

mnwlls написа:По-скоро питането го разбирам като: дали можеш да се откажеш от БГ гражданство, ако нямаш друго.
За Канада вече знаем

Чл. 12. (1) Лице, което не е български гражданин, може да придобие българско гражданство, ако към датата на подаване на молбата за натурализация:
6. е освободено от досегашното си гражданство или ще бъде освободено от него към момента на придобиване на българско гражданство.

veselinaz написа:независима от държавата и регулациите в нея